Marine Selected to Head Joint Chiefs - NYT | New Way the U.S. Projects Power Around the Globe: Commandos - WSJ

Marine Selected to Head Joint Chiefs

1 Share
President Obama plans on Tuesday to name Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., a former top commander in Afghanistan who now serves as commandant of the Marine Corps, to be the next chairman of theJoint Chiefs of Staff, according to officials briefed on the selection.
If he is confirmed by the Senate, General Dunford, 59, will take over the top military leadership position at a time of daunting challenges for the armed forces. It would fall to him to complete Mr. Obama’s troop withdrawal from Afghanistan by the end of next year while prosecuting a grinding air war against the Islamic State.
General Dunford would succeed Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, who is retiring after four years as the nation’s top general. General Dempsey was a favorite of the president’s and the go-to person at the Pentagon for White House officials who grew disenchanted with Chuck Hagel as defense secretary. Mr. Hagel has since been replaced by Ashton B. Carter.
It may be hard for General Dunford to duplicate the relationship General Dempsey had with Mr. Obama and his team, but the president is said to hold him in high regard as a strategic thinker who grasps the complexities of today’s world. Mr. Obama plans to make the announcement at noon on Tuesday in the Rose Garden.
In addition to putting General Dunford forward, Mr. Obama plans to nominate Gen. Paul J. Selva of the Air Force, the commander of the United States Transportation Command, to serve as vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs. He would succeed Adm. James A. Winnefeld Jr., who is retiring.
The two leaders would not only oversee the armed forces through the end of Mr. Obama’s tenure, but they would also face the task of managing the Pentagon budget amid great flux. Both political parties want to spare the Defense Department the brunt of automatic spending cuts set to take effect, but even if it receives more money than is scheduled, the military may have some significant choices to make.
General Dunford, who would be only the second Marine to serve as chairman, is viewed as a straight talker who was able to manage security around last year’s Afghan presidential elections as the United States was ending its combat mission.
His nomination had been expected several weeks ago, but an administration official said it was held up after Mr. Carter expressed interest in another possible candidate, Adm. Samuel Locklear, the head of the United States Pacific Command. But a senior defense official disputed that and said Mr. Carter strongly supported General Dunford’s nomination, having worked with him before.
A Boston native who graduated from St. Michael’s College and was commissioned in 1977, General Dunford earned master’s degrees from Georgetown University and the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. He led a regiment into combat during the 2003 invasion of Iraq, became commander of American and coalition forces in Afghanistan in February 2013, then took over as commandant of the Marine Corps last October.
He drew attention for being unflappable in the most stressful situations, from testifying in tense congressional hearings to commanding troops in battle, other officers said.
Gen. James N. Mattis, a retired commander of American forces in the Middle East, recalled watching a rocket-propelled grenade streak over General Dunford’s Humvee in Iraq and blow up 100 yards away. “He barely glanced up and then went right back to writing his orders,” General Mattis said in a telephone interview on Monday night.
Read the whole story
 
· ·

Congress Launches Probe Into White House Data Breaches

1 Share
Sen. John Thune / AP
Sen. John Thune / AP
BY: Adam Kredo 
Congress has launched a probe into cyber attacks on White House computer networks that are believed to have exposed personally identifiable information of U.S. citizens and official meetings with ambassadors, according to a letter sent to President Obama by a Senate investigatory committee.
Lawmakers are attempting to determine the extent of a recent breach reported to have been committed by Russian hackers in 2014. While the White House initially downplayed the extent of the information accessed by these cyber criminals, investigators say the breach may have been more widespread than previously believed.
The White House has revealed few details about the attack, but it is believed the 2014 breach is just one of several attacks by hackers in recent months.
Sen. John Thune (R., S.D.), chairman of the Senate’s Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, is now seeking to determine the full extent of the breach and to discern how much personal information the hackers accessed.
“Though the hackers do not appear to have accessed any classified information, the unclassified computer system reportedly contains a great deal of sensitive information, such as schedules, policy discussions, and emails you sent and received, including exchanges with ambassadors,” Thunewrote in a letter to Obama on April 30.
The system breached by hackers also contained information about Americans who have been to the White House, compromising their social security numbers and other personal information.
It is unclear whether the White House has contacted these individuals to let them know that their information was potentially accessed.
“Increasing reports of attacks across Executive Branch departments and agencies raise serious questions as to whether they are adequately prepared to address vulnerabilities and protect sensitive information,” Thune wrote. “Given this recent hack, as well as prior incidents in 2009 and 2011, concerns remain that the White House’s network infrastructure remains vulnerable.”
A White House National Security Council (NSC) spokesman would not provide further information about the 2014 breach but said that the administration is working to keep lawmakers informed about cyber threats.
“While we will not comment further on details of the EOP activity we have previously publicly disclosed and briefed to the Hill, we have consistently supported timely notification in the event of data breaches, consistent with existing federal policy,” Mark Stroh, a spokesman for the NSC, said in a statement. “The White House acts in accordance with this policy and is consistent with the policy’s security considerations that are necessary to protect Federal networks.”
However, Thune is seeking more information. He has given the White House a May 15 deadline to answer key questions about the breach.
The Senate committee is requesting information about whether the recent attack compromised the personally identifiable information of any individuals. It also is seeking to determine whether the White House has informed those who may have had their information compromised.
The committee also is seeking a detailed readout of the security policies the White House has in place to prevent such attacks in the future.
While the White House has issued public notifications regarding data breaches in the past, a 2007 policy document released by the White House states that it “does not attempt to set a specific threshold for external notification since breaches are specific and context dependent and notification is not always necessary or desired.”
Thune’s office is pushing the White House to be more transparent when it comes to breaches that could affect Americans.
“While the White House’s own data breach notification policy states that ‘notification is not always necessary or desired,’ Sen. Thune continues to seek assurances from the White House that it will notify affected Americans should it become apparent that personally-identifiable information, which could harm individuals, was lost in the recent cyberattack,” said Thune’s spokesman, Frederick Hill.
Read the whole story
 
· · · ·

Islamic State Takes Responsibility for Texas Cartoon Exhibit Attack

1 Share
The area around a car that was used the previous night by two gunmen is investigated by local police and the FBI in Garland
The area around a car that was used the previous night by two gunmen is investigated by local police and the FBI in Garland / Reuters
BY: Reuters
By David Schwartz
PHOENIX (Reuters) – The Islamic State militant group claimed responsibility on Tuesday for an attack on a Texas exhibit of caricatures of the Prophet Mohammad in which the two gunmen were killed.
The Syria- and Iraq-based Islamic State claimed responsibility on its official online radio station, saying “two soldiers of the caliphate” carried out the attack on Sunday in Garland, Texas. Experts warn that militant groups have been known to claim credit for attacks in which they were not involved.
U.S. government sources close to the case have said investigators were scouring electronic communications sent and received by the dead gunmen, roommates Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, of Phoenix, for evidence of contacts between them and militant groups overseas, most notably Islamic State.
Simpson and Soofi were killed by police when they opened fire with assault rifles at the cartoon exhibit and contest. An unarmed security guard was wounded.
Court documents showed Simpson had been under federal surveillance since 2006 and was convicted in 2011 of lying to FBI agents about his desire to join violent jihad in Somalia.
“I believe that perhaps he might have just snapped when he heard about the cartoon contest,” Kristina Sitton, a Phoenix attorney who defended him in the case, told CNN.
“It certainly was a … completely provocative event and I would see many people who were devout about their religion being upset.”
Garland Mayor Douglas Athas said he did not make the decision to hold the exhibit in town, since the local school district owned the building where it was held.
The shooting in Garland, a Dallas suburb, was an echo of attacks or threats in other Western countries against images depicting the Prophet Mohammad.
In January, gunmen killed 12 people in the Paris office of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in what was said to be revenge for its cartoons. Such portrayals are considered offensive by Muslims.
Police and federal agents had planned security for months ahead of the event, organized by American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), a free-speech organization that the Southern Poverty Law Center has described as a hate group.
Sitton said Simpson had never shown any desire to join violent jihad.
“It just sounded like a lot of talk especially compared with his demeanor when I was speaking with him and when I met with him,” she said.
(Additional reporting by Jon Herskovitz in Austin, Texas; Ahmed Tolba in Cairo, Egypt; Writing by Ian Simpson; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe)
Read the whole story
 
· · ·

President Obama’s choice of Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, the commandant

1 Share
President Obama’s choice of Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, the commandant of the Marine Corps and a former commander in Afghanistan, must be confirmed by the Senate.

This post has been generated by Page2RSS

69365Search 69,365 Articles:

1 Share
69365

White House Looks to Ease Arab Fears Over Iran Nuclear Pact

By HELENE COOPER
One option would put in writing, but not send to Congress, language agreeing to the defense of Arab allies if they came under attack from outside forces.
May 2, 2015, Saturday

This post has been generated by Page2RSS

Taliban 'welcome' Afghan peace efforts after Qatar talks

1 Share
Taliban militants who have been waging war on the Afghan government for more than a decade on Monday expressed a willingness to soften their position on a range of issues, an apparent shift that could eventually lead to peace talks.
     
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 2

US military: No indication civilians killed in Syria strike

1 Share
The U.S. military denied Monday reports that civilians were killed in U.S.-led coalition airstrikes last week on a village controlled by the Islamic State group in northern Syria. Meanwhile the rights group which first reported the civilian casualties said the death toll has risen to 64, including at least 31 children.
     

In the face of Islamic State successes, al-Qaida adapts, grows stronger

1 Share
When al-Qaida overran the Yemeni port city of Mukalla last month, the group's commanders immediately struck a deal to share power with the area's tribesmen. The approach was a stark contrast to al-Qaida's rival, the Islamic State group, notorious for its savagery. And that was precisely the point.
     

Ex-CIA official: GOP distorted agency analysis of Benghazi

1 Share
A former CIA deputy director says Republicans repeatedly distorted the agency's analysis of the Benghazi attack in 2012 that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans. He also says U.S. intelligence agencies failed to recognize that al-Qaida would rapidly regain strength after the killing of Osama bin Laden.
     

Official identifies gunman in Muhammad cartoon event attack

1 Share
One of two gunmen who opened fire with assault rifles at a Prophet Muhammad cartoon contest in Texas has been identified by a law enforcement official as a man who was on the FBI's radar four years ago during a terrorism investigation. Authorities credited an off-duty officer working security at the event with saving lives by killing the gunmen.
     

Russia's new Armata tank makes debut in parade rehearsal

1 Share
Russia's new Armata tank appeared in public for the first time Monday, rumbling down a broad Moscow avenue on its way to Red Square for the final rehearsal of the Victory Day parade.
     

Former CIA leader defends drone strikes, torture

1 Share
President Barack Obama ordered a barrage of CIA drone strikes in Yemen in 2013 that killed the al-Qaida operatives behind the most serious plotting against American interests in years, a former CIA leader says in a new memoir that broadly defends the targeted killing of terrorists.
     
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 3

Iran: U.S. Navy Escorting British Ships Through Strait After Detention Dispute 

1 Share
The Navy has been accompanying United States-flagged ships through the strait in response to last week’s detention of the MV Maersk Tigris by Iranian Revolutionary Guards patrol boats.

ISIS Claims Link to Attack at Texas Event Showing Muhammad Cartoons 

1 Share
The Islamic State called the assailants in Garland “soldiers of the caliphate,” but whether the extremist group was involved remained unclear.

US Navy Carrier Drone Snagged by Delays, Indecision on Features

1 Share
The multi-billion dollar UCLASS is the Navy's project to develop an unmanned aircraft able to be launched from aircraft carriers to provide strike capability, surveillance and air support. The project has experienced delays amid the debate about what features should have priority, given costs and available technology.

Latvian Military Claims to Have Spotted 2 Russian Warships, Sub Near Border

1 Share
The Latvian National Armed Forces claim to have detected two Russian military ships and a submarine near Latvia's border.

Major War Games Kick Off in Estonia

1 Share
A major drill, involving a record-breaking number of troops began in Estonia Monday, the General Staff of the Estonian Defense Forces said in a statement.

US Awards $600 Million for NATO's Ballistic Missile Defense Kill Vehicle

1 Share
The US Missile Defense Agency awarded a $600 million contract for 44 anti-ballistic missiles to be placed in Romania as part of the NATO's missile defense shield, US defense contractor Raytheon said in a statement on Monday.
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 4

Canada's Navy Modernization Ends Up a Costly Drawn-Out Nightmare

1 Share
In the ever amplifying race for domination of the world's oceans, the Canadian government had set aside a small fortune to upgrade its navy. But after a series of snags, Ottawa may be forced to pay an even larger sum on even fewer ships.

Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL Terrorists in Iraq

1 Share
U.S. and coalition military forces have continued to attack Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant terrorists in Iraq, Combined Joint Task Force Operation Inherent Resolve officials reported today.

US Examines Report on Saudi Arabia Cluster Bombs Use in Yemen

1 Share
The Human Rights Watch report said that available video, photographs and other credible evidence had shown that the Saudi-led coalition had used cluster bombs near villages in northern Yemen, 'putting local people in danger.'

Coalition: No Major Ground Force In Yemen

1 Share
The Saudi-led coalition battling rebels in Yemen denied a major ground force had landed Sunday after reports of the deployment of troops in main southern city Aden.
       

Kerry: US Will Defend Against Iran Aggression

1 Share
Whether through diplomacy — it's preferred route — or a potential military option, Washington is "intent on guaranteeing" that Iran won't get a nuclear weapon, said US Secretary of State John Kerry.
       

Army, Marines Pressured To Use Same Ammo

1 Share
The Army and Marine Corps will conduct comprehensive testing this year to determine the viability of adopting common rifle ammunition, a potential cost-cutting initiative that could have serious implications for troops on the battlefield.
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 5

Yemen Unchanged Weeks Into Air War

1 Share
Saudi-led airstrikes against rebels in Yemen have destroyed much of their military capabilities, but almost six weeks into the campaign the situation on the ground remains unchanged, analysts said.
       

Dunford Tapped as Joint Chiefs Chair, Selva for Vice

1 Share
President Obama will announce Tuesday that he will nominated Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Joseph Dunford as the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, sources told Military Times.
       

First Turkish-Made Helos To Battle Kurds

1 Share
Two T129 Turkish-made attack helicopters were deployed at a southeastern military base in Turkey to support anti-terror operations against Kurdish rebels fighting for autonomy, the Turkish military headquarters said in a statement.
       

Mo Brooks, Dave Brat Denounce Illegals in Military

1 Share
In a statement Monday, Brat and Brooks announced their intention to remove language added as an amendment to the NDAA — which passed out of committee last week — that would encourage the Secretary of Defense to consider allowing illegal immigrants granted executive amnesty via the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program to serve in the military.
Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ)
offered the amendment, which passed and was attached to the NDAA on a vote of 33-30.
According to Brat and Brooks, the amendment puts illegal immigrants’ interests ahead of American citizens.
“It is unconscionable that certain members of Congress seek to use America’s military as a bargaining chip in a bid to cement the president’s unconstitutional amnesty actions – adding the amendment to the ‘must pass’ National Defense Authorization Act, a bill that is intended to authorize essential programs for our military. We can’t speak for other Congressmen, but, as for ourselves, we were elected to promote and protect the interests of American citizens, not illegal immigrants,” they said in a joint statement.
Brooks and Brat continued, arguing that the amendment would serve to endorse “a cycle of perpetual amnesty for illegal immigrants and betraying struggling young Americans who wish to serve in America’s armed forces.”
They concluded, stressing that they “are working to remove this language from the NDAA, and we urge our House leaders to support our efforts.”
Read their full statement:
“With passage of this amendment, a majority on the Armed Services Committee urged the Secretary of Defense to hire DACA illegal immigrants, rather than American citizens, at the same time the Pentagon is in the process of laying off tens of thousands of American troops.  According to Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno, the active Army will be cut by and/or lay off more than 80,000 uniformed personnel by the end of fiscal year 2017.  Further, competition for enlistment is so challenging that American high-school graduates now face, ‘more difficulty qualifying for the armed services than ever in the 40-year history of the all-volunteer force.’
“Do members of the House Armed Services Committee who voted for this amendment really believe that these are jobs Americans won’t do?  It is unconscionable that certain members of Congress seek to use America’s military as a bargaining chip in a bid to cement the president’s unconstitutional amnesty actions – adding the amendment to the  ‘must pass’ National Defense Authorization Act, a bill that is intended to authorize essential programs for our military.  We can’t speak for other Congressmen, but, as for ourselves, we were elected to promote and protect the interests of American citizens, not illegal immigrants.
“Moreover, given the crisis at our nation’s border where tens of thousands of children are pouring into our country illegally, it is mindboggling that Congress would consider a policy that encourages even more illegal immigrants to unlawfully cross America’s borders.
“Former leaders of the U.S. military wrote last year, ‘[Such a policy] would enable adoption by the Congress of measures that would confer amnesty on millions of immigrants illegally in this country and, by failing to secure the borders, ensure that millions more will be headed here in due course.’
“By voting to encourage DACA illegal immigrants to enlist in the military, members of Congress are both endorsing a cycle of perpetual amnesty for illegal immigrants and betraying struggling young Americans who wish to serve in America’s armed forces.
“Congress serves as a body to check and balance the powers of the executive branch in accordance with the Constitution, not to aid the White House in violating the Constitution.  Doing so with a national defense bill is especially troubling.  We are working to remove this language from the NDAA, and we urge our House leaders to support our efforts.”
Read the whole story
 
· · ·

Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr. - Google Search

1 Share
In the news
  • Image for the news result
    March 12, 2014: File photo, GenJoseph FDunfordJr. testifies on Capitol Hill in ...
  • More news for Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr.

    JCS Chairman Says Russian Fighter Intercept ‘Reckless and Unprofessional’

    1 Share
    Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey, left, accompanied by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, right, speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon, Thursday, April 16
    Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Martin Dempsey, left, accompanied by Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, right, speaks during a news conference at the Pentagon, Thursday, April 16 / AP
    BY: Bill Gertz 
    A recent Russian aerial intercept of an unarmed U.S. reconnaissance aircraft over Europe was “reckless and unprofessional,” the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said Thursday.
    Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman, also said Russia’s transfer of advanced air defense missiles to Iran will not alter U.S. plans for military action to prevent Tehran from obtaining nuclear arms.
    During a meeting with reporters at the Pentagon Dempsey dismissed the latest threats by Moscow to target U.S. missile defenses in Europe as “Russian rhetoric” that “goes back a long time,” but that has not led to a breakdown in communication between the two militaries.
    “And those channels remain open, as they do for dealing with things like unprofessional or reckless intercepts,” Dempsey said. “And this intercept was in fact both unprofessional and reckless and foolish, actually, in the sense that it was conducted for no apparent reason.”
    The incident in question took place April 7, when a Russian Su-27 fighter flew within 20 feet of a U.S. RC-135U reconnaissance aircraft flying in international airspace over the Baltic Sea.
    Dempsey’s comments characterizing the Russian action as reckless and unprofessional represent an escalation of rhetoric on the part of the Pentagon’s top military official. Earlier a Pentagon spokesman said only that the intercept was “unsafe” and unprofessional.
    Defense officials said the intercept was a near collision, and that the Su-27 was conducting a threatening pass over the RC-135.
    The Washington Free Beacon first reported the encounter on April 10.
    A day later a Russian Defense Ministry spokesman confirmed the incident but denied the pilot acted dangerously and claimed the RC-135 was operating without its signal transponder, a device that allows air traffic controllers to track commercial and military aircraft.
    Dempsey said the U.S. military has contacted Russia “through appropriate channels” and asked for an investigation to “determine whether it was purposeful, or if it was an isolated instance by a hot-blooded pilot.”
    “But it’s serious,” the four-star general said, adding that he has not yet received an answer from the Russian about the encounter.
    No details of the RC-135 mission were disclosed. However, defense officials said the aircraft, which conducts electronic intelligence gathering, was probably spying on the Russian enclave of Kaliningrad, where Moscow is said to be deploying nuclear-capable Iskander short-range ballistic missiles and possibly nuclear weapons.
    A report published recently by the European Leadership Network stated that provocative Russian aerial maneuvers and generally aggressive actions have increased sharply and appear to be military testing of NATO and U.S. defenses.
    The report found that NATO last year conducted more than 100 intercepts of Russian aircraft, a threefold increase from the previous year. Eleven encounters were described as serious and posing a risk of potential military escalation.
    The actions include harassment of reconnaissance planes, close overflights over warships, and mock bombing missions, according to the report.
    The increase in the provocative aerial encounters would indicate that the actions are not random activities by rogue pilots as Dempsey suggested may have been the case in the RC-135 intercept.
    In the last five years, Russia has protested to the United States over what Moscow claims are threatening U.S. missile defenses deployed in Europe. The United States insists the defenses are not designed to counter Russian offensive missiles, but Moscow has rejected those claims.
    On Thursday, Gen. Valery Gerasimov, Russia’s chief of the general staff, said during a defense conference in Moscow that U.S. defenses in Europe would be targeted by Russian forces.
    “Nonnuclear powers where missile-defense installations are being installed have become the objects of priority response,” Gerasimov said, in a reference to former Soviet satellite states Poland and Romania.
    Russia also has increased the threat posed by Iran by announcing that it will reverse an earlier ban on sales of S-300 air defense missiles.
    Asked how the new Russian missiles in Iran would affect the U.S. military option of taking out Iranian nuclear facilities, Dempsey said: “The introduction of the S-300 ordinance, the derivative that they export, the S-20 Charlie air defense system, we’ve known about the potential for that system to be sold to Iran for several years, and have accounted for it in all of our planning.”
    “The military option that I owe the president to both encourage the diplomatic solution and if the diplomacy fails to ensure that Iran doesn’t achieve a nuclear weapon, is intact.”
    According to Russian press reports, Russian Defense Ministry spokesman Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said the RC-135 was detected by air defense radars steadily flying toward Russia’s border.
    Konashenkov said “no emergency situation” was reported during the encounter.
    In addition to provocative intercepts, Russian nuclear capable bombers have been increasing missions near the United States and Europe.
    A defense official said there have been no recent encounters of Tu-95 Bear bombers flying near U.S. or Canadian coasts. However, the official said Russia is expected to begin spring military training in the near future and could conduct new flights into air defense identification zones.
    Defense Secretary Ash Carter, appearing with Dempsey, said the United States has been pressuring Moscow politically and economically as a result of Russia “fomenting trouble” in eastern Ukraine.
    “I’m not an economist, but I understand that those sanctions are having an effect on Russia, along with plummeting oil prices,” Carter said. “Those are the two factors bringing pressure to bear upon the Russian economy, and so the first line of pressure for us is economic and political. And we’re doing that.”
    Carter said there is abundant evidence of Russian covert meddling in Ukraine.
    Read the whole story
     
    · · · · ·
    Next Page of Stories
    Loading...
    Page 6

    general martin dempsey - Google Search

    1 Share
    NBCNews.com

    Obama picks Marine commander for next chairman of the Joint Chiefs

    Washington Post-14 hours ago
    Martin Dempsey, who will step down this fall after four years on the job. ... The president will also nominate Air Force General Paul J. Selva, the ...

    Obama to tap Gen. Joseph Dunford to top military post

    1 Share
    (CNN)President Barack Obama plans to name a trusted military adviser with ties to his drawdown of troops in Afghanistan as the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, multiple officials confirmed to CNN on Monday.
    Obama plans to name Gen. Joseph F. Dunford to the post at the White House on Tuesday.
    Dunford currently serves as the commandant of the Marine Corps. He'll replace Gen. Martin Dempsey,‎ who served in the top military role since 2011.
    Before taking the top job at the Marine Corps, Dunford acted as the top military commander in Afghanistan, leading the international effort there as Obama seeks to withdraw American troops.
    Dunford must first be confirmed by the Republican-controlled Senate before assuming the new post.
    Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain offered praise for the presumed pick on Monday.
    "I've known him very well for many years and he's an outstanding leader," said McCain, a Vietnam war veteran. "I'm very, extremely enthusiastic about his selection. He's a combat veteran. He's a warrior."
    A Boston native with a master's degree in government from Georgetown University and another master's in international relations from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Dunford served as an infantry officer and commanded the 5th Marine Regiment during the Iraq war. He's also held a long list of top Marine posts.
    CNN's Jim Sciutto and Eric Bradner contributed to this report.

    Obama picks Marine commander for next chairman of the Joint Chiefs

    1 Share

    Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr. speaks during a 2012 hearing of the Senate Armed Service Committee on Capitol Hill. President Obama is expected to announce that Dunford is his nomination to be the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty Images)
    President Obama will nominate Marine Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr. to become the next chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, selecting an experienced field commander to guide the United States through familiar insurgent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and new threats from cyberattacks and China’s military rise.
    U.S. officials said Obama is expected to announce Tuesday that Dunford, the commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps, is his pick to replace Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, who will step down this fall after four years on the job.
    The announcement is the second time that Obama, who has sought to overcome the rocky ties with uniformed leaders that characterized the early years of his administration, has picked a senior officer to provide him with military advice. Dunford must be confirmed by the Senate.
    The president will also nominate Air Force General Paul J. Selva, the head of U.S. Transportation Command, as vice chairman, officials said.
    Officials said Dunford, a Boston-area native and infantry officer, was a proven combat leader who had distinguished himself as commander of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan in 2013-2014 as foreign forces shifted responsibility for fighting the Taliban to Afghan troops. Dunford also commanded a Marine regiment early in the Iraq war.
    “What makes him attractive is that he’s a ground leader, and we’ve still got ground wars going on,” said an administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss the selection process.
    Retired Gen. James T. Conway, the Marine Corps’ top officer from November 2006 to October 2010, said he had seen Dunford rise to the challenge of big assignments before.. While serving under Conway, Dunford was seen as an impressive leader who essentially “skipped a star,” being selected for promotion from one-star general to three-star general in a matter of months. Dunford is the Marine Corps’ second chairman in history, after Gen. Peter Pace, who held the job from 2005-2007.
    James Mattis, the retired Marine general who once headed U.S. Central Command, said Dunford was “unflappable in the face of tension, an excellent listener and superbly accomplished in the operational art.”
    Dunford earned the nickname “Fighting Joe” while leading the 5th Marine Regiment as it became the first conventional force to cross into Iraq during the U.S. invasion there in March 2003. His Marines advanced north up Highway 1 from Kuwait, fighting a number of bloody battles while facing problems with weather and limited resources. Twelve Marines were killed and more than 120 were wounded in about a month, according to a Marine Corps unit history.
    Once confirmed, Dunford must grapple with a long list of challenges, including deep cuts to military spending, the spread of extremist groups across the Muslim world, and the expansionist ambitions of Russia and China.
    Most pressing on Dunford’s first day may be the evolving U.S. operations in Iraq, where about 3,000 U.S. soldiers are providing advice and training to Iraqi forces battling the Islamic State.
    While U.S. and allied airstrikes have helped Iraqi fighters halt the militants’ advance, the group is proving difficult to defeat. As the Iraq conflict unfolds, it will fall to Dunford to advise Obama about whether and how to expand U.S. operations there.
    He will also shape decisions about the future of a U.S. mission in Afghanistan. While the remaining U.S. force of 9,800 is supposed to be gone by the time Obama leaves office in 2017, the White House has already shown flexibility in revising earlier troop withdrawal plans. In picking a former Afghanistan commander, well acquainted with the demands of that fight, Obama may be lining himself up for additional pressure to keep troops longer.
    Sen. Jack Reed (R.I.), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said Dunford would be well served by his time in Afghanistan, where he commanded foreign troops, guided a complex U.S. operation and contended with the challenges of local politics. “There are few people that have had the experience he’s had,” Reed said in an interview.
    The U.S. military has a host of internal problems to solve, including needed reforms to benefits and weapons programs. The new chairman must also help restore the health of a force strained by intense demands and repeated deployments of the post-2001 era.
    Dunford will also have to walk a fine line in providing the president advice on military issues with big political ramifications, without veering into politicizing the military. “When that breaks down, it becomes extremely difficult and potentially fraught,” Shawn Brimley, a former White House official now with the Center for a new American Security, said of the need to protect the military’s non-political role.
    He will also oversee military ties with a White House that has often been difficult for outsiders to penetrate. As commmander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Dunford had more direct interaction with Obama than many generals.
    Dunford, known as an intellectual and a soft-spoken leader, did not attend the U.S. Naval Academy like many Marine officers. Instead, he studied at Saint Michael’s, a small Catholic college in Vermont, and later received master’s degrees from Georgetown University and Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.
    Dunford will work closely with Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter, himself only settling into the job after being confirmed in February.
    Dunford beat out other military leaders believed to be in the final running for the chairman job, including Adm. Samuel Locklear III, expected to step down shortly as head of U.S. Pacific Command; Gen. Mark Welsh III, the Air Force chief of staff; and Adm. James “Sandy” Winnefeld Jr., Dempsey’s deputy.
    Missy Ryan writes about the Pentagon, military issues, and national security for The Washington Post.
    Dan Lamothe covers national security for The Washington Post and anchors its military blog, Checkpoint.
    Continue reading
    Get the Act Four Newsletter
    Free twice-weekly updates delivered just for you.
    Success! Check your inbox for details.
    Please enter a valid email address
    You might also like:

    Our Online Games

    Play right from this page
    Read the whole story
     
    · · · · · ·

    New Way the U.S. Projects Power Around the Globe: Commandos

    1 Share
    MAO, Chad—“Is this good?” yelled the U.S. Special Forces sergeant. “No!”
    He waved a paper target showing the dismal marksmanship of the Chadian commandos he was here to teach. Dozens of bullet holes intended for the silhouette’s vital organs were instead scattered in an array of flesh wounds and outright misses.
    The Chadians, with a reputation as fierce desert fighters, were contrite. They dropped to the fine Saharan sand and pounded out 20 push-ups. “Next time, we’re going to shoot all of the bullets here,” one Chadian soldier said, gesturing toward the target’s solar plexus.
    Such scenes play out around the world, evidence of how the U.S. has come to rely on elite military units to maintain its global dominance.
    These days, the sun never sets on America’s special-operations forces. Over the past year, they have landed in 81 countries, most of them training local commandos to fight so American troops don’t have to. From Honduras to Mongolia, Estonia to Djibouti, U.S. special operators teach local soldiers diplomatic skills to shield their countries against extremist ideologies, as well as combat skills to fight militants who break through.
    President Barack Obama, as part of his plan to shrink U.S. reliance on traditional warfare, has promised to piece together a web of such alliances from South Asia to the Sahel. Faced with mobile enemies working independently of foreign governments, the U.S. military has scattered small, nimble teams in many places, rather than just maintaining large forces in a few.
    The budget for Special Operations Command in Tampa, Fla., which dispatches elite troops around the world, jumped to $10 billion in the fiscal year that ended on Sept. 30, from $2.2 billion in 2001. Congress has doubled the command to nearly 70,000 people this year, from 33,000 in fiscal 2001. The Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force provide further funding.
    Navy SEALs and Army Green Berets, for example, are stationed in the Baltics, training elite troops from Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia for the type of proxy warfare Russia has conducted in the Crimea and eastern Ukraine.
    U.S. forces are also winding down what they consider a successful campaign, begun soon after the Sept. 11 hijackings, to help Filipino forces stymie the al Qaeda-aligned Abu Sayyaf Group. And commanders believe U.S. training of Colombian troops helped turn the tide against rebels and drug traffickers.
    At times, U.S. special-operations troops take action themselves, as in the Navy SEAL raid that killedOsama bin Laden in his Pakistani hideout in 2011, or the rescue of freighter Capt. Richard Phillips from Somali pirates in 2009.
    U.S. special operators roam the forests of the Central African Republic, alongside Ugandan troops, hunting the leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army, Joseph Kony . The rebel group, considered a terrorist organization by the U.S., has forcibly recruited children into its ranks.
    But the vast majority of special-operations missions involve coaxing and coaching foreign forces to combat extremists the U.S. considers threats.
    ENLARGE
    Driving the idea are 14 years of fighting in Afghanistan, and the on-again-off-again battle in Iraq, expensive land wars that have sapped the political support of many Americans. At the same time, the U.S. faces threats from such free-range terror networks as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb in Mali; al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula in Yemen; Islamic State in Syria and Iraq; al-Shabaab in Somalia and Boko Haram in Nigeria. Most of these militants have no borders, instead concealing themselves among civilians disaffected with their own corrupt or inept rulers.
    The special-operations strategy has a mixed record. The U.S. tried it in Vietnam, only to watch an advisory mission metastasize into a costly, full-scale war. The U.S. put years of training into Mali’s military, which crumbled before the swift advance of al Qaeda and its allies in 2012.
    The partnership between U.S. and Yemeni special operators to battle al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula was disrupted earlier this year when an anti-American rebel group ousted the U.S.-aligned president.
    One skeptic, James Carafano, vice president for defense and foreign policy at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said relying on special-operations forces was akin to saying, “I’m not going to do brain surgery because I’m going to give you an aspirin. The world doesn’t work that way.”
    Commandos can hunt down enemy leaders or train small indigenous units, Mr. Carafano said, but they alone can’t build a capable national army.
    The strategy isn’t always flexible enough to meet immediate threats. American efforts to enlist, train and arm moderate Syrian rebels have moved so slowly that some potential allies have given up on Washington. Many have been overrun by the same extremist groups the U.S. sought to defeat.
    The three-week military exercises in Chad, which ended last month, are a microcosm of the U.S. strategy. The annual event started small a decade ago, and has grown to include 1,300 troops, with special-operations contingents from 18 Western nations coaching commandos from 10 African countries.
    “We have a common threat in the form of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Boko Haram and other extremist organizations that threaten our way of life,” said Maj. Gen. Jim Linder, the outgoing commander of Special Operations Command-Africa.
    The allied nations included the U.K., Spain, Italy, Belgium, Germany, Denmark and others that over the past decade have forged a global special-operations network, primarily by training local forces together in Afghanistan. Lithuania and Latvia sent observers to Chad this year, raising the possibility the nations will join next year’s exercises in Senegal.
    Several African countries face extremists of one stripe or another. Mauritanian paratroopers have fought al Qaeda and its allies in Mali. German special forces mentored Tunisians, whose country borders the chaos of Libya.
    A Spanish special-forces soldier watches a truckload of Chadians roll by during multicountry military exercises in Chad in February.ENLARGE
    A Spanish special-forces soldier watches a truckload of Chadians roll by during multicountry military exercises in Chad in February. Photo: Michael M. Phillips/The Wall Street Journal
    Niger and Cameroon defend their territory against Boko Haram, a group infamous for kidnapping hundreds of young people and slaughtering thousands in rampages through northeastern Nigeria.
    Scores of Nigerian Special Boat Service commandos, who have trained with U.S. Navy SEALs, were in Chad to receive tactical advice from British instructors: How to set up an ambush, how to drag a wounded comrade out of danger and how to move through the sparse Sahelian forests.
    At many points over the past six years, the U.S., Chad, Niger and others have criticized Nigeria for using brutal tactics against civilians who might otherwise help them flush out militants.
    The Nigerian response to Boko Haram didn’t work effectively and “actually in some places made it worse,” Gen. David Rodriguez, commander of Africa Command, told an audience at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., in January. The U.S. and its allies hope the latest training will help the Nigerians turn the tide.
    American training has helped Chadian troops block the militants’ advance. But Chad is unlikely to be able to reverse Boko Haram’s gains unless Nigeria, which has the region’s biggest economy and largest army, steps up its own campaign, according to commanders.
    “We can’t declare victory and be triumphalist yet,” said Chadian Brig. Gen. Zakaria Ngobongue.
    The training exercises, dubbed Flintlock, were held in Chad, but U.S. Special Operations Command-Africa took the leading role and spent between $6 million and $7 million, the lion’s share of the cost, the military said. The West Virginia Air National Guard, and the Canadian and Spanish air forces provided cargo planes to ferry troops and supplies.
    Though it has a population of just 12 million, landlocked Chad covers an area three times as large as California, much of it in the Sahara. It borders an array of hot spots, including Libya, Sudan, Central African Republic and, across Lake Chad, Nigeria.
    Smugglers dealing in arms, drugs and humans cross Chad and neighboring Niger, many heading to or from Libya to the north. “There’s vast, empty territory with porous borders, and it contains a huge terrorist threat,” said Chadian army Col. Khassim Moussa.
    Chadians have long fought America’s enemies, from the Nazis to the late Libyan leader, Col. Moammar Gadhafi. In the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, the U.S. urged Chad to set up a commando unit to counter regional threats. In 2010, Chad launched its Special Anti-Terrorist Group, with the understanding that American special operators would be the trainers.
    The U.S. has provided the unit with more than 50 vehicles over the past year, along with uniforms, spare parts, radios, generators and ambulances, said Col. Khassim, its chief of staff. American special operators train Chadians three or four times a year, the colonel said.
    The commandos cut a striking image, roaming battlefields in Toyota TM -0.61 % Land Cruiser pickup trucks armed with heavy antiaircraft guns, their heads wrapped in checked scarves and sunglasses. They are the first to fight when Chad goes to war, which is often.
    Chadian troops fought in Mali in 2013, for example, joining French forces to push back al Qaeda. The antiterrorist unit recently ventured into Nigeria, a mission the soldiers training with U.S. Special Forces last month expected to undertake, as well.
    An American Special Forces medic checks the blood pressure of a patient at a military-run medical clinic in Mao, Chad.ENLARGE
    An American Special Forces medic checks the blood pressure of a patient at a military-run medical clinic in Mao, Chad. Photo: Michael M. Phillips/The Wall Street Journal
    The special-operations approach can run up against laws barring American troops from working with foreign military units known to have violated human rights, which include some Nigerian units. The Chadians also faced such allegations. Chadians served as peacekeepers during sectarian strife in Central African Republic, but they withdrew last year following accusations they took sides and fired on civilians.
    Chadian officials said their troops have at times run roughshod over the people they were supposed to protect. Col. Khassim said American training has helped. “Soldiers aren’t behaving the way they were before,” he told residents of Mao, a desert town and training site, in February. “You civilians don’t have to fear the military.”
    U.S. special operators are encouraged to learn local culture, language and politics as they report on a country’s vulnerability to extremists. “This isn’t spying—this is armed anthropology,” said David Maxwell, a former Special Forces colonel now at Georgetown University.
    The work draws soldiers with more than a hint of Peace Corps aspirations. The leader of one Special Forces team in Chad grew up in neighboring Cameroon, the son of missionaries. He speaks both French, the colonial language of Chad, and West African pidgin English, a skill that surprised Nigerian commandos at his camp. He rarely starts a conversation with African counterparts without first politely asking whether they’ve had a good night’s sleep, an approach that signals respect in the region.
    Anti-extremist campaigns often push U.S. special operators into spheres once strictly the realm of civilians, combining tactical training with social and economic outreach.
    American psychological-operations soldiers helped build a jungle radio network in Uganda, South Sudan and Central African Republic to encourage defections among Lord’s Resistance Army fighters. Special-operations civil-affairs teams, based in American embassies in three-dozen countries, work with U.S. diplomats and development experts to improve such public services as water supply to stoke the popularity of governments friendly to U.S. interests.
    In Mao, special operators paused the ambush training and mock patrols to hold a free medical clinic. While American, Danish, Italian and German medical personnel pulled rotten teeth, felt babies’ foreheads and dispensed anti-parasite drugs, Chadian commandos handed out pesticide-laced bed netting and Prudence-brand condoms.
    “The thought is that if the Chadian people see they have a legitimate and capable defense force, they’ll feel more secure,” said one special-operations doctor. “A secure and stable Chad is one far less susceptible to Boko Haram and other insurgent influences.”
    “We’re drawing a line in the sand literally here,” the doctor said.
    Write to Michael M. Phillips at michael.phillips@wsj.com
    Read the whole story
     
    · · · · · · · · · · · ·

    Obama Calls for New Commitment to Help Minority Youths Succeed 

    ____________________________________________

    » U.S. Military: Put in Harm's Way for Global Empire
    04/05/15 20:54 from Mike Nova's Shared Newslinks
    mikenova shared this story from rss. The the U.S. military is deployed in over 80 countries around the world. But why? And should they be there?
    ____________________________________________

    Selected Comments: 

    -
    [M.N.: Shall we call it "the bandaids and beans" strategy? What are the results of its application in practice so far?]

    Terry Hardeman
    Meanwhile, as America's most experienced, trained and capable troops are sent into the African bush to handout bandaids and beans to fractious tribesmen of limited strategic value, America's military is being dismantled from within by the Obama Dictatorship to a level not seen in modern history at a time when our enemies are on the march across the world, and even within America's border's. America's elite warrior's should be training for the coming showdown with those who want to overthrow the global order and to either prevent or mitigate nuclear armed fanatical states like Iran or North Korea from instigating catastrophic regional conflict, and defeating the Global Jihad, as the world marches toward global conflagration reminiscent of the 1930s.

    The Navy has as many ships as it had during the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt. A primary component of force projection, and therefore global stability- the Amphibious Readiness Group, has been cut to 33 ships, the bare minimum requirement to respond to the contingencies of a more stable global security situation of five years ago is 38, as determined by the overly optimistic Quadrennial Defense Review. We have less combat power in regards to troops, ships, combat aircraft, and overall logistical and technological investment than at anytime since World War II. 

    Since Barack Obama has taken office, America has retreated from its role as moral guarantor of global stability; look how that is working out. Seventy year's after World War II, and less than 25 after the end of the Cold War, American's obsessed with the trivial and capricious nature of their decaying popular culture, have ignored the lesson's of the last Century, while the world careens toward a global conflagration with nuclear armed belligerents. 

    Most of this is the result of an Obama Dictatorship which sees as its duty the  weakening of the United States from within economically, politically, culturally, and militarily. Now, more than ever, we need voices speaking the the necessity of mobilizing national will toward safeguarding America's survival against the threats to it, both internal and external, and we should be preparing our military for the type of operations necessary to succeed in the coming catastrophe, not internal defense for illiterate tribesmen. 

    ROBERT SARTINI
    Why do I think the Chadian trainees are just doing it for a paycheck but when the shooting starts they will vanish if not join the other side. 

    -
    [M.N.: Just as it happened in Afghanistan, unfortunately:]

    And when they decide our interests aren't their interests we have a well trained rebel insurgency to help kill us. Not sure about this strategy.



    ________________________


    New Way the U.S. Projects Power Around the Globe: Commandos

    Over the past year, special-operations forces have landed in 81 countries, mostly to train local troops to fight so Americans don’t have to

    A woman peeks into the women and children’s tent during a military-sponsored clinic in Mao.
    An American Green Beret leads Chadian antiterrorist commandos in a round of 20 push-ups after a disappointing performance on the rifle range in Mao, Chad, in February.
    A Chadian commando mediates during a scrum over a bednet being given away at a medical clinic run by U.S. and allied special-operations forces in Mao.
    A blind girl is pushed through the crowd trying to get treatment at the free clinic.
    An American Special Forces medic checks the blood pressure of a patient at the clinic.
    A Chadian commando medic takes a blood pressure reading at the clinic.
    An American Green Beret supervises a Chadian commando during multicountry military exercises.
    Commandos from the Nigerian Special Boat Service practice dragging a buddy to safety during training with British special-operations troops in Mao.
    Chadian commandos keep order during a the medical clinic in Mao. U.S. Special Forces medics and other medical personnel conducted the clinic, partly to improve relations between Chadian troops and civilians.
    A U.S. Green Beret soldier keeps order during the clinic.
    Mauritanian paratroopers store their rifles after a day of training in the desert in Mao.
    A Spanish special-forces soldier watches a truckload of Chadians roll by during the multicountry military exercises.
    A woman peeks into the women and children’s tent during a military-sponsored clinic in Mao.
    An American Green Beret leads Chadian antiterrorist commandos in a round of 20 push-ups after a disappointing performance on the rifle range in Mao, Chad, in February.
    1 of 12fullscreen
    An American Green Beret leads Chadian antiterrorist commandos in a round of 20 push-ups after a disappointing performance on the rifle range in Mao, Chad, in February. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    A Chadian commando mediates during a scrum over a bednet being given away at a medical clinic run by U.S. and allied special-operations forces in Mao. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    A blind girl is pushed through the crowd trying to get treatment at the free clinic. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    An American Special Forces medic checks the blood pressure of a patient at the clinic. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    A Chadian commando medic takes a blood pressure reading at the clinic. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    An American Green Beret supervises a Chadian commando during multicountry military exercises. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    Commandos from the Nigerian Special Boat Service practice dragging a buddy to safety during training with British special-operations troops in Mao. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    Chadian commandos keep order during a the medical clinic in Mao. U.S. Special Forces medics and other medical personnel conducted the clinic, partly to improve relations between Chadian troops and civilians. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    A U.S. Green Beret soldier keeps order during the clinic. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    Mauritanian paratroopers store their rifles after a day of training in the desert in Mao. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    A Spanish special-forces soldier watches a truckload of Chadians roll by during the multicountry military exercises.MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    A woman peeks into the women and children’s tent during a military-sponsored clinic in Mao. MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    MAO, Chad—“Is this good?” yelled the U.S. Special Forces sergeant. “No!”
    He waved a paper target showing the dismal marksmanship of the Chadian commandos he was here to teach. Dozens of bullet holes intended for the silhouette’s vital organs were instead scattered in an array of flesh wounds and outright misses.
    The Chadians, with a reputation as fierce desert fighters, were contrite. They dropped to the fine Saharan sand and pounded out 20 push-ups. “Next time, we’re going to shoot all of the bullets here,” one Chadian soldier said, gesturing toward the target’s solar plexus.
    Such scenes play out around the world, evidence of how the U.S. has come to rely on elite military units to maintain its global dominance.
    These days, the sun never sets on America’s special-operations forces. Over the past year, they have landed in 81 countries, most of them training local commandos to fight so American troops don’t have to. From Honduras to Mongolia, Estonia to Djibouti, U.S. special operators teach local soldiers diplomatic skills to shield their countries against extremist ideologies, as well as combat skills to fight militants who break through.
    President Barack Obama, as part of his plan to shrink U.S. reliance on traditional warfare, has promised to piece together a web of such alliances from South Asia to the Sahel. Faced with mobile enemies working independently of foreign governments, the U.S. military has scattered small, nimble teams in many places, rather than just maintaining large forces in a few.
    The budget for Special Operations Command in Tampa, Fla., which dispatches elite troops around the world, jumped to $10 billion in the fiscal year that ended on Sept. 30, from $2.2 billion in 2001. Congress has doubled the command to nearly 70,000 people this year, from 33,000 in fiscal 2001. The Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force provide further funding.
    Navy SEALs and Army Green Berets, for example, are stationed in the Baltics, training elite troops from Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia for the type of proxy warfare Russia has conducted in the Crimea and eastern Ukraine.
    U.S. forces are also winding down what they consider a successful campaign, begun soon after the Sept. 11 hijackings, to help Filipino forces stymie the al Qaeda-aligned Abu Sayyaf Group. And commanders believe U.S. training of Colombian troops helped turn the tide against rebels and drug traffickers.
    At times, U.S. special-operations troops take action themselves, as in the Navy SEAL raid that killed Osama bin Laden in his Pakistani hideout in 2011, or the rescue of freighter Capt. Richard Phillips from Somali pirates in 2009.
    U.S. special operators roam the forests of the Central African Republic, alongside Ugandan troops, hunting the leader of the Lord’s Resistance Army, Joseph Kony . The rebel group, considered a terrorist organization by the U.S., has forcibly recruited children into its ranks.
    But the vast majority of special-operations missions involve coaxing and coaching foreign forces to combat extremists the U.S. considers threats.
    ENLARGE
    Driving the idea are 14 years of fighting in Afghanistan, and the on-again-off-again battle in Iraq, expensive land wars that have sapped the political support of many Americans. At the same time, the U.S. faces threats from such free-range terror networks as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb in Mali; al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula in Yemen; Islamic State in Syria and Iraq; al-Shabaab in Somalia and Boko Haram in Nigeria. Most of these militants have no borders, instead concealing themselves among civilians disaffected with their own corrupt or inept rulers.
    The special-operations strategy has a mixed record. The U.S. tried it in Vietnam, only to watch an advisory mission metastasize into a costly, full-scale war. The U.S. put years of training into Mali’s military, which crumbled before the swift advance of al Qaeda and its allies in 2012.
    The partnership between U.S. and Yemeni special operators to battle al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula was disrupted earlier this year when an anti-American rebel group ousted the U.S.-aligned president.
    One skeptic, James Carafano, vice president for defense and foreign policy at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said relying on special-operations forces was akin to saying, “I’m not going to do brain surgery because I’m going to give you an aspirin. The world doesn’t work that way.”
    Commandos can hunt down enemy leaders or train small indigenous units, Mr. Carafano said, but they alone can’t build a capable national army.
    The strategy isn’t always flexible enough to meet immediate threats. American efforts to enlist, train and arm moderate Syrian rebels have moved so slowly that some potential allies have given up on Washington. Many have been overrun by the same extremist groups the U.S. sought to defeat.
    The three-week military exercises in Chad, which ended last month, are a microcosm of the U.S. strategy. The annual event started small a decade ago, and has grown to include 1,300 troops, with special-operations contingents from 18 Western nations coaching commandos from 10 African countries.
    “We have a common threat in the form of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Boko Haram and other extremist organizations that threaten our way of life,” said Maj. Gen. Jim Linder, the outgoing commander of Special Operations Command-Africa.
    The allied nations included the U.K., Spain, Italy, Belgium, Germany, Denmark and others that over the past decade have forged a global special-operations network, primarily by training local forces together in Afghanistan. Lithuania and Latvia sent observers to Chad this year, raising the possibility the nations will join next year’s exercises in Senegal.
    Several African countries face extremists of one stripe or another. Mauritanian paratroopers have fought al Qaeda and its allies in Mali. German special forces mentored Tunisians, whose country borders the chaos of Libya.
    A Spanish special-forces soldier watches a truckload of Chadians roll by during multicountry military exercises in Chad in February.ENLARGE
    A Spanish special-forces soldier watches a truckload of Chadians roll by during multicountry military exercises in Chad in February. PHOTO: MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    Niger and Cameroon defend their territory against Boko Haram, a group infamous for kidnapping hundreds of young people and slaughtering thousands in rampages through northeastern Nigeria.
    Scores of Nigerian Special Boat Service commandos, who have trained with U.S. Navy SEALs, were in Chad to receive tactical advice from British instructors: How to set up an ambush, how to drag a wounded comrade out of danger and how to move through the sparse Sahelian forests.
    At many points over the past six years, the U.S., Chad, Niger and others have criticized Nigeria for using brutal tactics against civilians who might otherwise help them flush out militants.
    The Nigerian response to Boko Haram didn’t work effectively and “actually in some places made it worse,” Gen. David Rodriguez, commander of Africa Command, told an audience at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C., in January. The U.S. and its allies hope the latest training will help the Nigerians turn the tide.
    American training has helped Chadian troops block the militants’ advance. But Chad is unlikely to be able to reverse Boko Haram’s gains unless Nigeria, which has the region’s biggest economy and largest army, steps up its own campaign, according to commanders.
    “We can’t declare victory and be triumphalist yet,” said Chadian Brig. Gen. Zakaria Ngobongue.
    The training exercises, dubbed Flintlock, were held in Chad, but U.S. Special Operations Command-Africa took the leading role and spent between $6 million and $7 million, the lion’s share of the cost, the military said. The West Virginia Air National Guard, and the Canadian and Spanish air forces provided cargo planes to ferry troops and supplies.
    Though it has a population of just 12 million, landlocked Chad covers an area three times as large as California, much of it in the Sahara. It borders an array of hot spots, including Libya, Sudan, Central African Republic and, across Lake Chad, Nigeria.
    Smugglers dealing in arms, drugs and humans cross Chad and neighboring Niger, many heading to or from Libya to the north. “There’s vast, empty territory with porous borders, and it contains a huge terrorist threat,” said Chadian army Col. Khassim Moussa.
    Chadians have long fought America’s enemies, from the Nazis to the late Libyan leader, Col. Moammar Gadhafi. In the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, the U.S. urged Chad to set up a commando unit to counter regional threats. In 2010, Chad launched its Special Anti-Terrorist Group, with the understanding that American special operators would be the trainers.
    The U.S. has provided the unit with more than 50 vehicles over the past year, along with uniforms, spare parts, radios, generators and ambulances, said Col. Khassim, its chief of staff. American special operators train Chadians three or four times a year, the colonel said.
    The commandos cut a striking image, roaming battlefields in Toyota Land Cruiser pickup trucks armed with heavy antiaircraft guns, their heads wrapped in checked scarves and sunglasses. They are the first to fight when Chad goes to war, which is often.
    Chadian troops fought in Mali in 2013, for example, joining French forces to push back al Qaeda. The antiterrorist unit recently ventured into Nigeria, a mission the soldiers training with U.S. Special Forces last month expected to undertake, as well.
    An American Special Forces medic checks the blood pressure of a patient at a military-run medical clinic in Mao, Chad.ENLARGE
    An American Special Forces medic checks the blood pressure of a patient at a military-run medical clinic in Mao, Chad. PHOTO: MICHAEL M. PHILLIPS/THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
    The special-operations approach can run up against laws barring American troops from working with foreign military units known to have violated human rights, which include some Nigerian units. The Chadians also faced such allegations. Chadians served as peacekeepers during sectarian strife in Central African Republic, but they withdrew last year following accusations they took sides and fired on civilians.
    Chadian officials said their troops have at times run roughshod over the people they were supposed to protect. Col. Khassim said American training has helped. “Soldiers aren’t behaving the way they were before,” he told residents of Mao, a desert town and training site, in February. “You civilians don’t have to fear the military.”
    U.S. special operators are encouraged to learn local culture, language and politics as they report on a country’s vulnerability to extremists. “This isn’t spying—this is armed anthropology,” said David Maxwell, a former Special Forces colonel now at Georgetown University.
    The work draws soldiers with more than a hint of Peace Corps aspirations. The leader of one Special Forces team in Chad grew up in neighboring Cameroon, the son of missionaries. He speaks both French, the colonial language of Chad, and West African pidgin English, a skill that surprised Nigerian commandos at his camp. He rarely starts a conversation with African counterparts without first politely asking whether they’ve had a good night’s sleep, an approach that signals respect in the region.
    Anti-extremist campaigns often push U.S. special operators into spheres once strictly the realm of civilians, combining tactical training with social and economic outreach.
    American psychological-operations soldiers helped build a jungle radio network in Uganda, South Sudan and Central African Republic to encourage defections among Lord’s Resistance Army fighters. Special-operations civil-affairs teams, based in American embassies in three-dozen countries, work with U.S. diplomats and development experts to improve such public services as water supply to stoke the popularity of governments friendly to U.S. interests.
    In Mao, special operators paused the ambush training and mock patrols to hold a free medical clinic. While American, Danish, Italian and German medical personnel pulled rotten teeth, felt babies’ foreheads and dispensed anti-parasite drugs, Chadian commandos handed out pesticide-laced bed netting and Prudence-brand condoms.
    “The thought is that if the Chadian people see they have a legitimate and capable defense force, they’ll feel more secure,” said one special-operations doctor. “A secure and stable Chad is one far less susceptible to Boko Haram and other insurgent influences.”
    “We’re drawing a line in the sand literally here,” the doctor said.
    Write to Michael M. Phillips at michael.phillips@wsj.com



    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    New questions arise about House Democratic caucus’s loyalty to Obama | » Democrats Stymie Obama on Trade 12/06/15 22:13 from WSJ.com: World News - World News Review

    Немецкий историк: Запад был наивен, надеясь, что Россия станет партнёром - Военное обозрение

    8:45 AM 11/9/2017 - Putin Is Hoping He And Trump Can Patch Things Up At Meeting In Vietnam

    Review: ‘The Great War of Our Time’ by Michael Morell with Bill Harlow | FBI File Shows Whitney Houston Blackmailed Over Lesbian Affair | Schiff, King call on Obama to be aggressive in cyberwar, after purported China hacking | The Iraqi Army No Longer Exists | Hacking Linked to China Exposes Millions of U.S. Workers | Was China Behind the Latest Hack Attack? I Don’t Think So - U.S. National Security and Military News Review - Cyberwarfare, Cybercrimes and Cybersecurity - News Review

    10:37 AM 11/2/2017 - RECENT POSTS: Russian propagandists sought to influence LGBT voters with a "Buff Bernie" ad

    3:49 AM 11/7/2017 - Recent Posts

    » Suddenly, Russia Is Confident No Longer - NPR 20/12/14 11:55 from Mike Nova's Shared Newslinks | Russia invites North Korean leader to Moscow for May visit - Reuters | Belarus Refuses to Trade With Russia in Roubles - Newsweek | F.B.I. Evidence Is Often Mishandled, an Internal Inquiry Finds - NYT | Ukraine crisis: Russia defies fresh Western sanctions - BBC News | Website Critical Of Uzbek Government Ceases Operation | North Korea calls for joint inquiry into Sony Pictures hacking case | Turkey's Erdogan 'closely following' legal case against rival cleric | Dozens arrested in Milwaukee police violence protest