These 5 Stats Explain Turkey’s War on ISIS—and the Kurds
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
On the heels of a major suicide bombing in the border town of Suruç a couple weeks ago, Turkey has officially joined the war against ISIS—though it’s not clear what it actually aims to achieve. Turkey and its leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan were riding high just a few years ago, with a strong economy and a growing international profile. Now the country’s economy is tumbling, and its politics are fragmenting. These 5 facts explain Turkey’s various motivations for going to war. Be warned—they’re complicated.
1. A Faltering Economy
Until recently, Turkey was an emerging market darling. In 2010, its economy was growing at a robust 9.2 percent. But by 2013, GDP growth had fallen to 4.1 percent. The slowdown has continued, and growth for 2015 is now forecast at 3.1 percent, which may actually be a generous estimate. Unemployment in the country has reached 11 percent, the highest rate in 5 years.
It’s not clear that joining the fight against ISIS will directly help Turkey’s economy. In fact, it probably won’t—fighting wars, especially open-ended ones, cost money. But it will distract a populace that’s growing increasingly unsettled by the economy’s slowdown.
2. Stumbling AKP
The slowing economy has also upended the country’s politics. Turkey was a secular Muslim country for nearly a century until 2002, when Erdogan’s Islamic Justice and Development Party (AKP) rose to power. It went on to win four consecutive elections, peaking at 49.9 percent in 2011, while presiding over a booming economy. Since then Erdogan has seen his personal popularity plunge from 71 percent to 37.5 percent today. Support for the AKP dropped nearly 10 percent in elections this past June, and the party lost an absolute legislative majority it had enjoyed for 13 years. Who capitalized on the AKP’s poor election performance? The pro-Kurdish HDP, which entered parliament for the first time by capturing 13 percent of the vote. (Political parties must win at least 10 percent of the vote in Turkey in order to enter the legislature.)
Now the AKP must choose between inviting an opposition party to join a coalition government or calling early elections to try to regain its majority. Joining the ISIS war effort serves two political aims: it tarnishes the HDP by associating the party with Kurdish separatist groups accused of terrorism, and it drums up enough nationalist sentiment to peel off votes from the far-right Nationalist Movement Pary. Erdogan will watch the polls. If the AKP’s numbers rise toward 50 percent, he’s likely to push for another vote.
3. Syrian Refugees in Turkey
Turkey is currently providing shelter for nearly 2 million Syrian refugees, and that figure is projected to rise another 500,000 by the end of 2015. Put another way, more than half of the 4 million Syrians who have fled their country during the civil war now reside in Turkey. Ankara has established 25 refugee camps, and reports say they are relatively well-run. The problem is the cost—Ankara estimates that it has spent nearly $5.6 billion on refugees since the beginning of the crisis. Combined with its flagging economy, it is not clear how much longer Turkey can continue shouldering the burden. The sooner the fighting in Syria ends, the sooner these refugees can return home.
4. Violent History with the PKK
Now things start to get murky. On July 20, an ISIS suicide bomb ripped through the Turkish town of Suruç, killing 32 people. The victims were supporters of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), the Kurdish separatist party based in Turkey and affiliated with the People’s Protection Units (YPG), the Kurdish group currently battling ISIS in Syria. After the Suruç attack, some Turks blamed the AKP government for not protecting the country against terrorism, while Turkish Kurds have accused the government of being complicit in the attacks. They claim that Erdogan’s government has tolerated ISIS attacks on Kurds because ISIS militants threaten Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, Turkey’s enemy, and also prevent Kurds from gaining ground in Syria that might help them to eventually create a larger Kurdish homeland in the region.
Erdogan may have declared war on ISIS to blunt criticism that he is soft on terrorism, but this bombing really speaks to the long strained relationship between Turks and Kurds. The Kurds are a sizeable ethnic minority in the region that have been agitating for independence for decades. The last 40 years have been marred by Turkish-Kurdish violence, claiming the lives of 40,000 people. A ceasefire was reached in March 2013, but it didn’t last long. According to Turkish security authorities, the PKK has carried out over 2,000 acts of violence in 2015 alone.
5. A War Against…Whom?
It’s obvious that Ankara is alarmed by the progress Kurdish fighters in Syria are making against ISIS and Assad, which they fear will only stoke the independence dreams of Turkish Kurds. In response to the Suruç bombing, Turkish police launched security raids across the country, rounding up more than 1,300 suspects in a matter of days. But the number of PKK militants detained outnumber ISIS affiliates more than 6 to 1. Between July 23 and July 26, 75 Turkish jets flew 155 sorties against 400 or so PKK targets. Number of ISIS targets hit? Three.
Officially joining the war against ISIS will give Turkey the cover it needs to bomb the Kurdish separatists carving out territories along the Turkish border. And it seems Washington is willing to ignore attacks on Kurds in exchange for US access to the Incirlik airbase, useful for bombing ISIS inside Iraq. Only time will tell if Turkey and America’s political and military strategies will pay off.
Read the whole story
· · · ·
CBS Local |
Bond revoked for man charged with shooting at Zimmerman
Washington Post SANFORD, Fla. — A man accused of shooting at George Zimmerman during a traffic encounter has had his bond revoked and is heading to jail. A judge on Friday said Matthew Apperson should be jailed because he was charged with committing a new crime ... Man charged with shooting at Zimmerman faces jail againPhilly.com Man accused of shooting at Zimmerman faces jail againWJXT Jacksonville Man in George Zimmerman case returned to jailWKMG Orlando WFTV Orlando all 37 news articles » |
There's a reason why "once in a blue moon" is a saying and the night sky on Friday will prove it.
NATO agrees on support package for Iraq to strengthen security, defense sectors
Ukraine's top court says rebel-held areas in the east can get limited self-rule - but MPs are yet to vote on the changes.
Former Taliban Official Claims Rivals Creating New Leadership Councilby support@pangea-cms.com (RFE/RL's Radio Free Afghanistan)
A former Taliban official says the newly elected leader of the militant group faces significant opposition from within.
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 2
Charleston gunman Dylann Roof pleads not guilty to federal charges including hate crimes
Germany halts treason inquiry into journalists after protestsby Kate Connolly in Berlin
‘For the good of media freedom’, Germany’s prosecutor general suspends investigation into reporters who said state planned to boost surveillance
A treason investigation into two journalists who reported that the German state planned to boost online surveillance has been suspended by the country’s prosecutor general following protests by leading voices across politics and media.
Harald Range, Germany’s prosecutor general, said on Friday he was halting the investigation “for the good of press and media freedom”. It was the first time in more than half a century that journalists in Germany had faced charges of treason.
Continue reading...
New investigation reveals startling death toll as some police departments rethink their policies
Striking French ferry workers have blocked roads to Calais with a burning wall of tyres, causing further chaos for British holidaymakers.
The Guardian |
Alexander Litvinenko family blames Putin for murder – video
The Guardian Ben Emmerson, the lawyer for the Litvinenko family, says on Friday that the former KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko was murdered at the behest of Vladimir Putin. He says Russian authorities have been obstructing the inquiry into Litvinenko's death. |
Российская Газета |
Путин предложил премьеру Израиля объединить усилия в борьбе с "ИГ"
Российская Газета Как сообщает пресс-служба Кремля, главы государств обменялись мнениями по обстановке на Ближнем Востоке. Владимир Путин отметил необходимость объединения усилий всех заинтересованных сторон в борьбе с угрозами, исходящими от террористической группировки ... Путин обсудил с Нетаньяху договоренности по иранской ядерной проблемеВзгляд Путин заявил Нетаньяху о необходимости объединить усилия в борьбе с ИГИнформационное агентство России ТАСС Путин предложил израильскому премьеру объединить усилия в борьбе с ИГТелеканал "Звезда" (Регистрация) Московский комсомолец -РИА Новости -MIGnews.com Все похожие статьи: 31 » |
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 3
inoСМИ.Ru |
Путин и колоссальный долг России
inoСМИ.Ru В стремлении обеспечить себе широкую поддержку на последних президентских выборах и справиться с недовольством населения (средний класс не оценил «смену мест слагаемых» Путина и Медведева) исполнительная власть объединила репрессивную политику в отношении ... и другие » |
International Business Times |
Vladimir Putin To Visit Crimea? Russian President To Join Great Silk Road ...
International Business Times Russian President Vladimir Putin rides a horse near the Western Sayan Mountains in southern Siberia's Tuva region August 15, 2007. Putin will join an expedition with the Russian Geographical Society to Great Silk Road sites in Crimea in late August. Putin Reportedly Heading To Crimea For His Latest Annual AdventureRadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty Putin to go on Crimea mission with Russian Geographical SocietyPravda all 3 news articles » |
Telegraph.co.uk |
Russia cuts interest rates as Putin faces renewed crisis from falling oil prices
Telegraph.co.uk Russia cuts interest rates as Putin faces renewed crisis from falling oil prices. Russia's central bank implements smallest interest rate cut this year, as policymakers face tricky task of boosting growth while controlling inflation. Russia's central ... and more » |
Business Insider |
Lawyer: Russia's 'tin pot despot' Putin and his 'cronies' are behind spy's ...
Business Insider Russian President Vladimir Putin is a "tin pot despot" who, with Kremlin "cronies," was behind the 2006 poisoning murder of ex-KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko in London, the lawyer for his widow said on Friday. Kremlin critic Litvinenko died three weeks ... Litvinenko inquiry: Vladimir Putin 'ordered killing'BBC News Poisoned spy's widow believes Vladimir Putin behind husband's murderHamilton Spectator Alexander Litvinenko lawyer points finger at Putin as inquiry endsThe Guardian Yahoo News UK all 104 news articles » |
Business Insider |
Russia is modernizing an advanced missile system for Iran, says Putin aide
Business Insider MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia is modernizing its S-300 missile system to supply to Iran, an adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Thursday, RIA news agency reported. "It has partially been updated, separate elements are still being updated ... Putin praises Iran deal in call with NetanyahuU.S. News & World Report Putin discusses Iranian nuclear deal with Netanyahu in 30-minute phone callUPI.com all 222 news articles » |
The Guardian |
From Putin to Mullah Omar, traces of cold war paranoia still shape our world
The Guardian For the full pathos, seen from the other side, there's a documentary film made by a Putin acolyte as High Noon of the brave Soviets under siege from pro-democracy protesters. “Putinsucceeded in persuading the crowd to fall back and made clear he was ... |
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 4
Newsweek |
Five Questions Every Presidential Candidate Should Answer About Vladimir Putin
Newsweek Russian President Vladimir Putin attends an educational youth forum in Russia on July 14. How well do the potential presidents understand Putin's expansionist ambitions? The author suggests five questions every presidential candidate should be able to ... Russian Sanctions: Putin Signs Decree Ordering All Western Imported Food ...International Business Times Former Kremlin banker: Putin 'is the richest person in the world until he ...Business Insider Putin Signs Decree Ordering Destruction of Banned FoodThe Moscow Times (registration) Nouse -UPI.com -Reuters Blogs (blog) all 111 news articles » |
This fact about the rampant corruption of Putin's Russia is just devastating
Vox In most countries, criminals need to make their dirty money clean in order to make it useful in the legitimate economy. As any Breaking Bad fan knows, that's what money laundering is: a way to bring the proceeds of crime onto account books and into ... |
Georgia is moving away from a confrontational, anti-Kremlin line toward accommodation with Russia. The shift comes as a new Cold War is gathering strength in Europe, with the fighting in Ukraine drawing the West and Moscow into a contest for spheres of influence.
China Expels Military Leader From Party, Charges With Corruption by webdesk@voanews.com (VOA News)
China has expelled 73-year-old military leader Guo Boxiong from the ruling Communist party, accusing him of corruption -- one of the most senior military figures to be taken down by President Xi Jinping's wide-reaching anti-corruption drive. Chinese media say Guo was removed from the party on Thursday and handed over to military prosecutors, a move anticipated since he was put under investigation earlier this year. He is expected to stand trial in a court system controlled by the...
Turkey: 5 Killed in Clashes Between Authorities, PKKby webdesk@voanews.com (Associated Press)
Kurdish rebels raided a Turkish police station and fired on railway workers in two separate attacks that left five dead, officials said Friday, amid renewed conflict between the security forces and insurgents that has wrecked a fragile peace process. Violence has sharply increased in Turkey in the past week, with the government launching aerial strikes against Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, bases in northern Iraq, and the rebels escalating attacks against Turkey's security...
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 5
The head of Russia's domestic security agency said the United States, Georgia, and several Western European countries helped prevent terrorist attacks during last year's Winter Olympics.
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 6
Russia is modernizing its S-300 missile system to supply to Iran, an adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin said on July 30, RIA news agency reported.
Trial Of Russian Army Officer-Turned-Taliban Begins In U.S.by support@pangea-cms.com (RFE/RL)
A jury was selected July 30 in the case of a Russian military officer charged with leading a Taliban attack on U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
Top Omar Aide Says New Taliban Leader Faced Oppositionby support@pangea-cms.com (RFE/RL's Radio Free Afghanistan)
A close aide to late Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar said the newly elected leader of the militant group faces significant opposition from within.
A top Kremlin aide says Russia and France have reached an agreement on reimbursement for two Mistral warships that Russia purchased but will not receive.
U.S. Sanctions Official: Russia 'Will Probe With A Bayonet'by support@pangea-cms.com (Carl Schreck)
The U.S. State Department's coordinator for sanctions policy says he believes Western sanctions are keeping Russian aggression in check but that "patience and determination" are critical to their success.
Putin Reportedly Heading To Crimea For His Latest Annual Adventure by support@pangea-cms.com (Robert Coalson)
Russian President Vladimir Putin, according to Russian media, is a man of action. He likes to get outdoors. One day he's rescuing wildlife, the next day he's flying fighter jets or discovering ancient Greek earthenware under the sea. Now, Putin is apparently going on another archaeological expedition.
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 7
Pakistani media are quoting unnamed Taliban sources as saying that Jalaluddin Haqqani, the founder of the militant Haqqani network, has been dead for almost a year.
No issue in negotiations over a Trans-Pacific Partnership seems to elicit more passion than pharmaceuticals, with both sides using the language of life and death.
An Israeli’s violent rampage at the event in Jerusalem was quickly politicized by critics of Israel.
Mullah Muhammad Omar, the secretive leader of the Taliban, spent the final years of his life in remarkable obscurity, and his death was confirmed only by chatter among Taliban officials.
Yemenis marching in the southwestern city of Taiz in favor of the Saudi-led coalition that is battling Shiite Houthi rebels.
Sex workers in windowed booths waited for customers in Seoul, South Korea. As the human rights group Amnesty International considers pressing for decriminalization of prostitution, some countries are pushing toward harsher penalties for those who pay for sex.
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 8
The Obama administration may have grander ambitions to open up American relations with Tehran and be part of a transformation in the Middle East.
(LONDON) — Britain says it is granting dissident Chinese artist Ai Weiwei a six-month visa, apologizing for rejecting his application over an alleged criminal conviction.
On Thursday Ai disclosed that the British embassy in Beijing had turned down his request for a business visa, saying he had failed to disclose a criminal conviction. It gave him a visit for 20 days instead.
Ai was jailed for almost three months in 2011 amid a crackdown on dissent. His company was later accused of tax evasion and ordered to pay $2.4 million. Ai’s lawyer said that was not a criminal case.
Britain’s Home Office said Friday that Home Secretary Theresa May had told officials to grant the six-month visa. It said it had written to Ai “apologizing for the inconvenience caused.”
A monthslong inquiry into the 2006 death from poisoning of former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko concluded Friday after a parade of witnesses provided evidence that British police said “points unwaveringly” at two men working at the behest of the Russian state.
Evidence shows former agent Litvinenko’s death was on Kremlin chief’s orders, QC says
BEIJING—As much of the world focuses on Greece’s travails, the BRICS countries—Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa—have been working to advance their own economic agenda, most recently at their seventh annual summit in the Siberian city of Ufa. But, though Russia hosted the meeting, it is China that was viewed as dominating the grouping. Indeed, BRICS has already proved to be a force multiplier for Chinese diplomacy, and can remain so if China is careful not to push its national interests too hard.
So far, China has played a pivotal role in driving progress toward real cooperation in BRICS. In recent weeks, its members have each pledged $10 billion to their New Development Bank, which should start lending next year; released a common strategy for economic and trade cooperation; and agreed to a $100-billion contingency fund to provide temporary assistance to members facing balance-of-payments pressures.
But BRICS’ future remains uncertain, owing to strong economic headwinds. Brazil is wracked by corruption scandals and stagnating output. Russia is probably in recession, owing largely to Western sanctions imposed in response to its intervention in Ukraine. India has been suffering from a depreciating currency and soaring public debts. China’s GDP grew by only 7.4 percent last year, the lowest rate in 24 years. And South Africa’s growth has been weak, not least due to energy shortages.
Given these developments, many Western observers have come to believe that BRICS is broken. Morgan Stanley’s Ruchir Sharma has emphasized that the winners of the last decade may not continue to win in this one. Even Jim O’Neill, who coined the term “BRIC,” has turned his attention to the “MINT” economies—Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey—BRICS’ key emerging-country competitors.
But not everyone is bearish about BRICS’ prospects and global influence, whether taken individually or as a grouping. Journalist Gideon Rachman has suggested that “the rise of non-Westerneconomies is a deeply rooted historic shift that can survive any number of economic and political shocks.” China seems to be counting on that being true.
In fact, BRICS remains an economic force to be reckoned with, accounting for 25.7 percent of world GDP, 42 percent of the global population, and 17 percent of total trade. The five countries attract more than 18 percent of the global total of foreign investment, hold 40 percent of all foreign-exchange reserves, and account for 30 percent of total foreign holdings of US Treasury bonds.
Moreover, BRICS consumption markets are worth more than $4 trillion, equivalent to those of the eurozone. And, according to Goldman Sachs, about 85 percent of the world’s middle class will be living in BRICS and other developing countries by 2030. Moreover, with many of the factors that have fueled BRICS’ rapid growth—including relatively low labor costs, rising productivity, trade liberalization, and the free flow of information and capital—still in play, writing off BRICS would be premature.
Still, the five countries have work to do. By delaying structural reforms, they have allowed their economies to accumulate risks and imbalances that have eroded their long-term health. In particular, they suffer from considerable income inequality, with their average Gini coefficient (where zero signifies absolute equality and one is absolute inequality) ranging from 0.37 to 0.50 in 2010-2013.
Working together, they have a better chance of implementing the reforms needed to boost their economies’ resilience—an opportunity that they have already identified. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration has sought massive support from China in implementing its national manufacturing policy and overcoming obstacles to developing infrastructure.
China is now going further, urging the rest of BRICS to institutionalize their cooperation, not just pursue domestic reform. China contends that a stronger BRICS would help safeguard the interests of all developing countries. To that end, China is also spearheading the effort to reform the global economic architecture, including by pushing for reforms in the International Monetary Fund’s weighted voting system.
But despite such efforts’ potential benefits for emerging and developing economies, they have provoked considerable anxiety among China’s BRICS partners, which fear that its leadership could quickly morph into domination. Beyond fundamental differences in the BRICS’ countries politicalsystems, social values, and cultural traditions—factors that undermine trust and cohesion—there is the obvious fact that China’s economy (not to mention its military) dwarfs the others’.
Indeed, bilateral trade between China and the rest of BRICS accounts for 85 percent of total intra-BRICS trade. Furthermore, China’s BRICS partners face keen competition from cheap Chinese-manufactured goods (intensified by what many view as China’s undervalued currency). Most trade-related complaints against China in the World Trade Organization in recent years were lodged by developing countries, including India and Brazil. China’s relationship with India is particularly fraught, owing to their seemingly intractable territorial dispute, as well as disagreements over the reform of the United Nations Security Council.
If China wants BRICS to continue to deepen ties, it should seek to act as a guiding hand within the grouping, adopting an approach that is more prudent than pushy. That means, above all, curbing its geopolitical competition with India and Russia. At the same time, in dealing with its advanced-country counterparts, it should be open and pragmatic, championing an inclusive global policy agenda that connects the developed and developing worlds.
A united anti-West bloc would not serve China’s interests any more than a grouping characterized by antagonism and divisions. What China—and the rest of the emerging and developing economies—needs is a nimble and cohesive BRICS with a strong reputation as a leading provider of global public goods. Project Syndicate
Minghao Zhao is a research fellow at the Charhar Institute in Beijing, an adjunct fellow at the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China, and a member of the China National Committee of the Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific.
Read the whole story
· · · ·
Let’s start with the geopolitical Big Bang you know nothing about, the one that occurred just two weeks ago. Here are its results: from now on, any possible future attack on Iran threatened by the Pentagon (in conjunction with NATO) would essentially be an assault on the planning of an interlocking set of organizations — the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization), the EEU (Eurasian Economic Union), the AIIB (the new Chinese-founded Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank), and the NDB (the BRICS’ New Development Bank) — whose acronyms you’re unlikely to recognize either. Still, they represent an emerging new order in Eurasia.
Tehran, Beijing, Moscow, Islamabad, and New Delhi have been actively establishing interlocking security guarantees. They have been simultaneously calling the Atlanticist bluff when it comes to the endless drumbeat of attention given to the flimsy meme of Iran’s “nuclear weapons program.” And a few days before the Vienna nuclear negotiations finally culminated in an agreement, all of this came together at a twin BRICS/SCO summit in Ufa, Russia — a place you’ve undoubtedly never heard of and a meeting that got next to no attention in the U.S. And yet sooner or later, these developments will ensure that the War Party in Washington and assorted neocons (as well as neoliberalcons) already breathing hard over the Iran deal will sweat bullets as their narratives about how the world works crumble.
The Eurasian silk road
With the Vienna deal, whose interminable build-up I had the dubious pleasure of following closely, Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif and his diplomatic team have pulled the near-impossible out of an extremely crumpled magician’s hat: an agreement that might actually end sanctions against their country from an asymmetric, largely manufactured conflict.
Think of that meeting in Ufa, the capital of Russia’s Bashkortostan, as a preamble to the long-delayed agreement in Vienna. It caught the new dynamics of the Eurasian continent and signaled the future geopolitical Big Bangness of it all. At Ufa, from July 8th to 10th, the 7th BRICS summit and the 15th Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit overlapped just as a possible Vienna deal was devouring one deadline after another.
Consider it a diplomatic masterstroke of Vladmir Putin’s Russia to have merged those two summits with an informal meeting of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). Call it a soft power declaration of war against Washington’s imperial logic, one that would highlight the breadth and depth of an evolving Sino-Russian strategic partnership. Putting all those heads of state attending each of the meetings under one roof, Moscow offered a vision of an emerging, coordinated geopolitical structure anchored in Eurasian integration. Thus, the importance of Iran: no matter what happens post-Vienna, Iran will be a vital hub/node/crossroads in Eurasia for this new structure.
If you read the declaration that came out of the BRICS summit, one detail should strike you: the austerity-ridden European Union (EU) is barely mentioned. And that’s not an oversight. From the point of view of the leaders of key BRICS nations, they are offering a new approach to Eurasia, the very opposite of the language of sanctions.
Here are just a few examples of the dizzying activity that took place at Ufa, all of it ignored by the American mainstream media. In their meetings, President Putin, China’s President Xi Jinping, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi worked in a practical way to advance what is essentially a Chinese vision of a future Eurasia knit together by a series of interlocking “new Silk Roads.” Modi approved more Chinese investment in his country, while Xi and Modi together pledged to work to solve the joint border issues that have dogged their countries and, in at least one case, led to war.
The NDB, the BRICS’ response to the World Bank, was officially launched with $50 billion in start-up capital. Focused on funding major infrastructure projects in the BRICS nations, it is capable of accumulating as much as $400 billion in capital, according to its president, Kundapur Vaman Kamath. Later, it plans to focus on funding such ventures in other developing nations across the Global South — all in their own currencies, which means bypassing the U.S. dollar. Given its membership, the NDB’s money will clearly be closely linked to the new Silk Roads. As Brazilian Development Bank President Luciano Coutinho stressed, in the near future it may also assist European non-EU member states like Serbia and Macedonia. Think of this as the NDB’s attempt to break a Brussels monopoly on Greater Europe. Kamath even advanced the possibility of someday aiding in the reconstruction of Syria.
You won’t be surprised to learn that both the new Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the NDB are headquartered in China and will work to complement each other’s efforts. At the same time, Russia’s foreign investment arm, the Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), signed a memorandum of understanding with funds from other BRICS countries and so launched an informal investment consortium in which China’s Silk Road Fund and India’s Infrastructure Development Finance Company will be key partners.
Full spectrum transportation dominance
On the ground level, this should be thought of as part of the New Great Game in Eurasia. Its flip side is the Trans-Pacific Partnership in the Pacific and the Atlantic version of the same, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, both of which Washington is trying to advance to maintain U.S. global economic dominance. The question these conflicting plans raise is how to integrate trade and commerce across that vast region. From the Chinese and Russian perspectives, Eurasia is to be integrated via a complex network of superhighways, high-speed rail lines, ports, airports, pipelines, and fiber optic cables. By land, sea, and air, the resulting New Silk Roads are meant to create an economic version of the Pentagon’s doctrine of “Full Spectrum Dominance” — a vision that already has Chinese corporate executives crisscrossing Eurasia sealing infrastructure deals.
For Beijing — back to a 7% growth rate in the second quarter of 2015 despite a recent near-panic on the country’s stock markets — it makes perfect economic sense: as labor costs rise, production will be relocated from the country’s Eastern seaboard to its cheaper Western reaches, while the natural outlets for the production of just about everything will be those parallel and interlocking “belts” of the new Silk Roads.
Meanwhile, Russia is pushing to modernize and diversify its energy-exploitation-dependent economy. Among other things, its leaders hope that the mix of those developing Silk Roads and the tying together of the Eurasian Economic Union — Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Kyrgyzstan — will translate into myriad transportation and construction projects for which the country’s industrial and engineering know-how will prove crucial.
As the EEU has begun establishing free trade zones with India, Iran, Vietnam, Egypt, and Latin America’s Mercosur bloc (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and Venezuela), the initial stages of this integration process already reach beyond Eurasia. Meanwhile, the SCO, which began as little more than a security forum, is expanding and moving into the field of economic cooperation. Its countries, especially four Central Asian “stans” (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan) will rely ever more on the Chinese-driven Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and the NDB. At Ufa, India and Pakistan finalized an upgrading process in which they have moved from observers to members of the SCO. This makes it an alternative G8.
In the meantime, when it comes to embattled Afghanistan, the BRICS nations and the SCO have now called upon “the armed opposition to disarm, accept the Constitution of Afghanistan, and cut ties with Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and other terrorist organizations.” Translation: within the framework of Afghan national unity, the organization would accept the Taliban as part of a future government. Their hopes, with the integration of the region in mind, would be for a future stable Afghanistan able to absorb more Chinese, Russian, Indian, and Iranian investment, and the construction — finally! — of a long-planned, $10 billion, 1,420-kilometer-long Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline that would benefit those energy-hungry new SCO members, Pakistan and India. (They would each receive 42% of the gas, the remaining 16% going to Afghanistan.)
Central Asia is, at the moment, geographic ground zero for the convergence of the economic urges of China, Russia, and India. It was no happenstance that, on his way to Ufa, Prime Minister Modi stopped off in Central Asia. Like the Chinese leadership in Beijing, Moscow looks forward (as arecent document puts it) to the “interpenetration and integration of the EEU and the Silk Road Economic Belt” into a “Greater Eurasia” and a “steady, developing, safe common neighborhood” for both Russia and China.
And don’t forget Iran. In early 2016, once economic sanctions are fully lifted, it is expected to join the SCO, turning it into a G9. As its foreign minister, Javad Zarif, made clear recently to Russia’s Channel 1 television, Tehran considers the two countries strategic partners. “Russia,” he said, “has been the most important participant in Iran’s nuclear program and it will continue under the current agreement to be Iran’s major nuclear partner.” The same will, he added, be true when it comes to “oil and gas cooperation,” given the shared interest of those two energy-rich nations in “maintaining stability in global market prices."
Got corridor, will travel
Across Eurasia, BRICS nations are moving on integration projects. A developing Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar economic corridor is a typical example. It is now being reconfigured as a multilane highway between India and China. Meanwhile, Iran and Russia are developing a transportation corridor from the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman to the Caspian Sea and the Volga River. Azerbaijan will be connected to the Caspian part of this corridor, while India is planning to use Iran’s southern ports to improve its access to Russia and Central Asia. Now, add in a maritime corridor that will stretch from the Indian city of Mumbai to the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas and then on to the southern Russian city of Astrakhan. And this just scratches the surface of the planning underway.
Years ago, Vladimir Putin suggested that there could be a “Greater Europe” stretching from Lisbon, Portugal, on the Atlantic to the Russian city of Vladivostok on the Pacific. The EU, under Washington’s thumb, ignored him. Then the Chinese started dreaming about and planning new Silk Roads that would, in reverse Marco Polo fashion, extend from Shanghai to Venice (and then on to Berlin).
Thanks to a set of cross-pollinating political institutions, investment funds, development banks, financial systems, and infrastructure projects that, to date, remain largely under Washington’s radar, a free-trade Eurasian heartland is being born. It will someday link China and Russia to Europe, Southwest Asia, and even Africa. It promises to be an astounding development. Keep your eyes, if you can, on the accumulating facts on the ground, even if they are rarely covered in the American media. They represent the New Great — emphasis on that word — Game in Eurasia.
Location, location, location
Tehran is now deeply invested in strengthening its connections to this new Eurasia and the man to watch on this score is Ali Akbar Velayati. He is the head of Iran’s Center for Strategic Research and senior foreign policy adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. Velayati stresses that security in Asia, the Middle East, North Africa, Central Asia, and the Caucasus hinges on the further enhancement of a Beijing-Moscow-Tehran triple entente.
As he knows, geo-strategically Iran is all about location, location, location. That country offers the best access to open seas in the region apart from Russia and is the only obvious east-west/north-south crossroads for trade from the Central Asian “stans.” Little wonder then that Iran will soon be an SCO member, even as its “partnership” with Russia is certain to evolve. Its energy resources are already crucial to and considered a matter of national security for China and, in the thinking of that country’s leadership, Iran also fulfills a key role as a hub in those Silk Roads they are planning.
That growing web of literal roads, rail lines, and energy pipelines, as TomDispatch has previously reported, represents Beijing’s response to the Obama administration’s announced “pivot to Asia” and the U.S. Navy’s urge to meddle in the South China Sea. Beijing is choosing to project power via a vast set of infrastructure projects, especially high-speed rail lines that will reach from its eastern seaboard deep into Eurasia. In this fashion, the Chinese-built railway from Urumqi in Xinjiang Province to Almaty in Kazakhstan will undoubtedly someday be extended to Iran and traverse that country on its way to the Persian Gulf.
A new world for Pentagon planners
At the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum last month, Vladimir Putin told PBS’s Charlie Rose that Moscow and Beijing had always wanted a genuine partnership with the United States, but were spurned by Washington. Hats off, then, to the “leadership” of the Obama administration. Somehow, it has managed to bring together two former geopolitical rivals, while solidifying their pan-Eurasian grand strategy.
Even the recent deal with Iran in Vienna is unlikely — especially given the war hawks in Congress — to truly end Washington’s 36-year-long Great Wall of Mistrust with Iran. Instead, the odds are that Iran, freed from sanctions, will indeed be absorbed into the Sino-Russian project to integrate Eurasia, which leads us to the spectacle of Washington’s warriors, unable to act effectively, yet screaming like banshees.
NATO’s supreme commander Dr. Strangelove, sorry, American General Philip Breedlove, insists that the West must create a rapid-reaction force — online — to counteract Russia’s "false narratives.” Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter claims to be seriously considering unilaterally redeploying nuclear-capable missiles in Europe. The nominee to head the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Commandant Joseph Dunford, recently directly labeled Russia America’s true “existential threat”; Air Force General Paul Selva, nominated to be the new vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs, seconded that assessment, using the same phrase and putting Russia, China and Iran, in that order, as more threatening than the Islamic State (ISIS). In the meantime, Republican presidential candidates and a bevy of congressional war hawks simply shout and fume when it comes to both the Iranian deal and the Russians.
In response to the Ukrainian situation and the “threat” of a resurgent Russia (behind which stands a resurgent China), a Washington-centric militarization of Europe is proceeding apace. NATO is now reportedly obsessed with what’s being called “strategy rethink” — as in drawing up detailed futuristic war scenarios on European soil. As economist Michael Hudson has pointed out, even financial politics are becoming militarized and linked to NATO’s new Cold War 2.0.
In its latest National Military Strategy, the Pentagon suggests that the risk of an American war with another nation (as opposed to terror outfits), while low, is “growing” and identifies four nations as “threats”: North Korea, a case apart, and predictably the three nations that form the new Eurasian core: Russia, China, and Iran. They are depicted in the document as “revisionist states,” openly defying what the Pentagon identifies as “international security and stability”; that is, the distinctly un-level playing field created by globalized, exclusionary, turbo-charged casino capitalism and Washington’s brand of militarism.
The Pentagon, of course, does not do diplomacy. Seemingly unaware of the Vienna negotiations, it continued to accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons. And that “military option” against Iran is neveroff the table.
So consider it the Mother of All Blockbusters to watch how the Pentagon and the war hawks in Congress will react to the post-Vienna and — though it was barely noticed in Washington — the post-Ufa environment, especially under a new White House tenant in 2017.
It will be a spectacle. Count on it. Will the next version of Washington try to make it up to “lost” Russia or send in the troops? Will it contain China or the “caliphate” of ISIS? Will it work with Iran to fight ISIS or spurn it? Will it truly pivot to Asia for good and ditch the Middle East or vice-versa? Or might it try to contain Russia, China, and Iran simultaneously or find some way to play them against each other?
In the end, whatever Washington may do, it will certainly reflect a fear of the increasing strategic depth Russia and China are developing economically, a reality now becoming visible across Eurasia. At Ufa, Putin told Xi on the record: “Combining efforts, no doubt we [Russia and China] will overcome all the problems before us.”
Read “efforts” as new Silk Roads, that Eurasian Economic Union, the growing BRICS block, the expanding Shanghai Cooperation Organization, those China-based banks, and all the rest of what adds up to the beginning of a new integration of significant parts of the Eurasian land mass. As for Washington, fly like an eagle? Try instead: scream like a banshee.
Read the whole story
· · · · · · · · · · ·
Next Page of Stories
Loading...
Page 9
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment